Authors: Anne Leclaire
The Lavender Hour (34 page)
“You have heard testimony from Dr. Wilber about the toxicology results. Luke Ryder did not die of cancer. His death was caused by acute narcotic intoxication. A fatal dose of barbiturates. Five times the lethal dose.
“You heard testimony that the defendant's fingerprints were on a medicine vial in Luke Ryder's home. You heard testimony that, in her training, she had specifically been told that volunteers were not to dispense medications, and yet she herself said that she gave Luke narcotics. You have heard testimony that her fingerprints were on a plastic bag found in the trash at Mr. Ryder's house.
“Jessie Long had opportunity. She herself testified that she had
been prescribed Seconal. She testified that, on the final day of Luke Ryder's life, she spent the afternoon with him while his mother slept upstairs. She alone was the last person to see him alive before his mother went to him later that night and found that he was dead.
“The opposing counsel has asked what Jessie Long's motive could possibly be. Why would this woman, who entered the deceased's home promising to help—why would she give Luke Ryder a lethal dose of Seconal?”
Nelson shrugged. “I do not know. We cannot know. Only she can know. Perhaps she believed it was an act of mercy. Perhaps, in fact, it was merciful. But it was not her decision to make, and I will not talk about the morality of this decision. That is not the question we are here today to debate, and, regardless of your personal beliefs, it should play no role in your deliberations. We will stick to the letter of the law, and in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, it is against the law to cause the death of another person or to assist that person in his death. Clear and simple, it is manslaughter. In a few minutes, you are going to be receiving instructions from Judge Savage regarding the law.
“And then you will begin your deliberations, and you will return with a verdict. The word verdict comes from the Latin and means 'to speak the truth.' The search for truth is now in your hands. And I suggest to you that, when you find the truth in this case, you will find the defendant guilty. Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
W
ORD SPREAD THAT
the jury had gone into deliberation, and the crowd outside the courthouse grew. Reporters milled around, cameras trained on the protesters and on a second, smaller group who had gathered in support of me. As I left the courthouse flanked by Gage and Lily, the crowd surged toward me. Gage waved aside the microphones thrust at us. “We'll have a statement later,” he said, as he hustled me toward the car.
“Where are we going?” I asked.
“Lunch,” he said. “I've reserved a table at Abbicci.”
“I can't eat,” I said.
“Relax,” Gage said. “There's no way the jury can find you guilty.”
I wished I could share his confidence. Nelson's closing had seemed frighteningly persuasive.
“How long do you think it will take to reach a verdict?” Lily asked.
“Juries are hard to predict,” Gage said. “Some of them come right back in an hour, and others like to go over every bit of the testimony. Depends on whether we've got a nitpicker in there.”
“What's your sense?” Lily asked.
“I think they'll come back today.”
“Today?” I said.
“Before five.”
I clutched Lily's hand. “Please,” I said to Gage. “I need to go home.”
Lily's brow creased with concern. “Are you all right, Jess?”
“No. I don't think so.”
“You probably need food,” Gage said.
I felt the air closing in. My voice was suddenly frantic. “No. I need to get out of here. I need to go home.”
“Okay,” Lily said, her tone calm, soothing. “Take it easy, Jess. We'll get you home.”
“Stay with her,” I heard Gage say to Lily. “And stay by the phone. I'll call you as soon as the jury returns.”
G
AGE WAS
mistaken. It was another two days before the jury reached a decision.
As they filed into the courtroom, they did not look over at the defense table. I couldn't remember what I had heard. Did the jury avoid looking at me if they thought I was innocent, or was it the other way around?
The foreperson, the mother who had lost a forty-six-year-old son, handed the verdict to the clerk, who passed it up to Judge Savage, who read it, her face impassive, and then handed it back to the clerk. She asked me to stand. Before the verdict was read, I dared one glance at the jurors. I was surprised to see that several of them were crying.
O
FTEN, THESE DAYS,
I think about the conversations I had with Lily as we walked along the bay side shore each day during the trial. There is one thing in particular she said that stays in my mind.
What we forget is as important as what we remember.
I can't know with certainty if this is true, but I believe it to be. I believe that one day I will no longer be haunted by the torment of the trial. I believe that the intensity of my grief will dim and I will remember the joy that love can bring. I believe what will stay with me is the power of connection and friendship.
I recall what Luke told me on the day that he died—You care this much now, and you will care this much again—and I pray that this is so. I hope that eventually I will remember not the pain of his death but the many lessons I was taught from his dying, the hard ones that crack your heart wide open in the learning.
After the trial was over, I received calls from several national organizations offering help if I decided to appeal. Lily thought I should fight. And Gage told me there were certainly grounds for appeal. Only Faye seemed to understand my willingness to accept both the verdict and Judge Savage's ruling. I was given a one-year suspended sentence, fifty hours of community service, and forbidden to ever again work for hospice.
When I refused to appeal, Lily thought it was because I was tired and didn't have the stomach for a fight. The truth is, I thought the verdict just. I was not guilt-free.
I had made foolish choices and had not taken responsibility for
them. I had not been honest with Faye. I had broken rules. I had been lost in my own need to find love, believing it possible to enter someone's life and take what you needed without considering what it cost them. I had loved not too much but too wrongly.
Although I had taken the plastic bag from the desk and given it to Luke, had opened the capsules when he couldn't manage the task, had dissolved them in ginger ale, I had not given him the fatal dose of Seconal. I stayed with him that afternoon until he fell asleep, sat with him through the very final moments, something I would not have believed I was capable of doing, but as I sat there, I kept hearing Faye. No one should have to die alone, she had told me that spring. We are stronger than we think, she had said.
But I had been weak, too. I know now I should not have left Nona alone with Luke that afternoon, knowing that he was gone. I should have woken her earlier and told her what Luke intended, made her a part of his death, as she had been of his birth. She was his mother and deserved that. I really believe she would have understood what he wanted to do and would have supported his choice. If I had found the courage to wake her and bring her to Luke's room, everything that followed would have been different.
Faye told me once that regret was a futile emotion, but I will forever regret not telling Nona.
“You were afraid,” Faye said, when I finally confessed to her.
Looking back now, I see that, for most of my life, I have been clenched in the steely jaws of fear. Afraid to commit, to fight for a job, to take chances, to stand with the man I had grown to care so deeply about.
As I look back, I am grateful for where I am now. I am living my second chance. I have been changed by the things that transform us all: Love, incalculable loss. And death, that most eloquent of teachers. Most of all, I have been altered by Luke.
D
URING THE
trial, Gage asked me what I had learned from Luke. Courage, I told him. I meant, of course, courage for the hard work
that dying requires. But I also meant I had learned not that the cost of bravery is high but that the price we pay for weakness is much greater.
I learned that it takes strength to love and that love is as indestructible as the hair on ancient mummies and can lead us to strange places. To grief, joy, and loss. To deception, betrayal, and redemption. It can bring us to our knees. Strand us in the shallows or lead us across an ocean. I learned that the very thing that breaks our hearts can be the necessary thing that heals us.
I
LEARNED,
too, from Paige. After the trial, others asked me if I harbored resentment toward her, for her actions. At first, I did, and then I realized that we were not so dissimilar, Paige and I. She, too, had lost a father and had felt abandoned by her mother. She was fighting to hold on in the only way she knew how. How could I blame her for that? How could I not love her for that?
W
HEN THE
year of my sentence was over, I stayed on the Cape. I am teaching again, a new beginning in a small private school with students I adore. Lily maintains that I am living in a state of radical hope.
I continue to rise early, as I did those mornings at the Harwich Port cottage. At dawn, I walk outside with my coffee, and I listen to the calls and songs of the birds. I remember when Luke told me that they sing out of joy, and as I listen to them, I wonder: If they can sing out of one emotion, why not more? And who is to say they don't? There is so much else to give voice to. Grief. Envy. Regret. Longing and loss.
Even in the lavender hour of sorrow, there is song.
LAVENDER
HOUR
Anne LeClaire
A Reader's Guide
C
ONVERSATION WITH
A
NNE
L
E
C
LAIRE
N. M. Kelby
(Nicole Mary Kelby) is a former print and television journalist and the author of three novels: In the Company of Angels, Theater of the Stars, and most recently, Whale Season. She met Anne LeClaire while in residence at the Ragdale Foundation in Lake Forest, Illinois, where both have been named Distinguished Fellows.
NMK:
The Lavender Hour strikes me as a book that puts death in its place in the cycle of life—it allows readers to embrace it as a part of life, to overcome their fear of it, and allow for the lessons it brings.
AL:
I don't know if most of us ever actually overcome our fear of death. I sense we are hardwired with that fear, but by witnessing it, in fiction as well as in fact, we are cracked open to the gift of its significant lessons.
NMK:
I find that most writers write from a dark place in their heart. Much of my work, including my comedic novel Whale Season, has been influenced by the death of my daughter. I write out of the need to find hope in darkness. Your work feels crafted along a similar path. Does writing provide you a way to own your private sorrow and to re-create it?
AL:
Writing provides me with a way to try to make sense of things. And to delve into issues like loss and grief and disconnection as well as to explore the role these things play in our lives. I am not re-creating a specific personal sorrow but draw on my experiences to inform the sorrows of the characters. The one step removed gives me just the distance I need to explore. I don't think of the
writing as coming from a dark place in my heart but from a center of hope. As Flannery O'Connor once responded to a reader who accused her of being a pessimist that only an optimist dares look life fully in the face. And her answer to people who complained that the novelist painted a picture of a world that is unbearable was “People without hope do not write novels.”
I do know that experiencing grief and exploring it through my stories has made me passionate about finding and celebrating joy. And life.
NMK:
What inspired you to write this particular story?
AL:
One sentence in a novel I was reading. I don't remember the name of the book or much about it except that a minor character in it was a hospice volunteer, and when I read that, I had the “solar plexus hit” I get when the germ of a story strikes. I thought about how people often envision hospice work as being about endings, but it can be about beginnings, too. I also recalled a sentence I heard during a lecture by Dr. Bernie Siegel: “We learn how to live from the dying.” That seemed a wonderful premise for a book about a hospice volunteer, and eventually it landed in Jessie's narrative. What can we learn? What are the costs of the lessons? How do we heal?
NMK:
Jessie, your heroine, is an amazing creation. As a reader, I felt both great sympathy and great antipathy toward her—and at times, she really made me mad. As a writer, I admire your skill in drawing such a flawed creature and applaud the choice. But what I really want to know is, do you like her? Would you take her out for girl talk, a glass of wine, and some steamers?
AL:
Oh, I just love Jessie. I feel such compassion for her. She is the part of all of us that urgently wants to connect—and isn't that exactly all we ever long for?—and then keeps messing it up. This is
the question I wanted to spend time with and in fact have been playing with for the last three books (Entering Normal, Leaving Eden, and The Law of Bound Hearts). If we long for connection, why do we keep messing it up? Of course, the answer is fear. I recently read somewhere that fear and longing are the two predominant emotions and motivating forces. In Jessie, they are in conflict with each other. And conflict in the human heart is always worth writing about.
As to hanging with her, I've just spent nearly two years with her and wouldn't mind some more, especially now that she has a lot of hard-earned wisdom to share.
A perfect day with Jessie would be to go for a long walk in the dunes at the National Seashore, then have those steamers, and cap the day by dancing at the Squire. And I'd love a piece of her jewelry.
NMK:
Just between you and me, why do you really think Jessie was attracted to Luke? Did it have something to do with her cancer?
AL:
Oh my, yes. At first, she was attracted to his looks and that sense she had of “I know you.” And then she fell in love with the person. It was such a daring thing for her to fall in love with someone who was going to leave her. Loving is always courting the possibility of loss, and with Luke, it was a sure thing.
NMK:
Lily, Jessie's mother, is so wonderful. Her “rebirth” after years of widowhood—finding a rich younger love (a dentist, no less!), letting her hair go gray, and jaunting away on a transatlantic sail with her lover—makes us all say “You go, girl!” It's interesting that Jessie has such a difficult time with her mother's new life.
AL:
Well, change can be such a threat and a challenge, especially when it occurs in someone close to us. Jessie wanted Lily to continue as she always was, her dependable foundation, and the glorious thing
about Lily refusing the role is that it forced Jessie to set down her own roots.
NMK:
At one point, you have Lily tell her daughter, “Sometimes you have to take a journey to find yourself.” What journey did you take when you wrote The Lavender Hour?
AL:
What a great question. Obviously I took a journey into grief and loss and the arena of the dying. Years ago, when I was writing Entering Normal, I came across a quote by Oscar Wilde: “Where there is sorrow there is holy ground.” I just love this quote and keep it by my computer. I think what Wilde meant was that it is in the times when we are brought to our knees with grief, absolutely humbled by loss, that we are doing soul work. That is when the heart cracks open and all our defenses are useless. You know this better than most, Nicole.
NMK:
The human heart is an unwieldy thing—I think that's what I'll admit to. Everybody knows sorrow. As I always say, “Life is a morbid adventure—so let's try to have some fun.”
AL:
I'm with you there, sister.
NMK:
You know, when I write, I always fall in love with my characters. After spending day after day with them, making them real, they seem real to me. I sometimes even dream of them. So I really hate killing them—even if they deserve it.
Was there ever a time in the process of writing this book that you found yourself pained over Luke's looming death? Or maybe regret the pain you cause his mother, Nona?
AL:
Only every day. I kept thinking, there must be a way to save him. But as a wise editor once told me, you can't save them all. And she was right.
Being a mother myself, I felt Nona's pain deeply, but I couldn't rescue her either. Giving people the dignity of their own pain is a tough thing to do, in writing and in life.
NMK:
The shades of grief that are portrayed in this book are amazing. From Paige, Luke's in-denial daughter, to his exhausted care-taking mother to his tough-guy best friend, it seems as if you've touched on every possible reaction to the death of a loved one. After my daughter died, I spent many years trying to avoid my grief. Only when I discovered the transformative power of writing, a decade later, did I begin to understand what I can learn from her death and how that loss enriched me as a person. Only since then have I been able to properly grieve. Do you see Luke's loved ones ever coming to grips with their grief?
AL:
Yes. Especially Nona. It will take Paige longer, I suspect. None of us would choose to go through the kind of devastating loss that you experienced, nor would we wish it on anyone. But loss is inevitable for all of us. It is the human condition.
I suspect it wasn't only your writing that transformed you but your experience. Even when you thought you were avoiding grief, you were living with it. Like the crucible in a science lab class, it burned away the crust and left you with the essence.
NMK:
I think you're right. That “essence” throws the rest of life into relief—it makes the joys more profound and the pleasures richer.
AL:
It awakens us to life.
NMK:
You seem to have done a good deal of research on hospice volunteers.
AL:
I was fortunate in that a number of people with extraordinarily generous hearts gave me insight into their experiences. I have
also had three friends die and have witnessed the key role hospice workers played during their last months.
NMK:
In this book, you provide the reader with a wealth of information on the Victorian practice of making jewelry from hair. The poet in me loves the idea that our heroine makes hair jewelry and some of her clients are cancer patients—it seems such a wonderful and gripping artistic expression for her. However, the shopper in me says “ick.”
Of course, I think this is what you were going for—that lovely conflicted feeling we have for Jessie—but I had to ask myself, what drew you, as a writer, to make this particular choice? Do you know someone who actually does make hair jewelry for people going through chemo?
AL:
I don't know of anyone who makes the jewelry for people in chemo, but through the Internet, I found a wonderful woman named Jeanenne Bell, author of Collector's Encyclopedia of Hairwork Jewelry, who gave me tons of information.
The aversion we have toward hair jewelry is fairly recent and reflects the conflicted feelings we have about death and our bodies. For centuries and centuries—well before the Victorian age so often associated with the craft—people have been making hair jewelry.
And, of course, as a symbol, hair is so rich, so absolutely loaded.
NMK:
You set your story in Cape Cod. You obviously have some strong feelings about the healing powers of place.
AL:
You yourself know the power of place, in life and in fiction. And you use it beautifully in your work. That is one of the things I loved about Whale Season.
Certainly there are sacred spots we are drawn to for healing, and I think Cape Cod is one.
NMK:
In Whale Season, the unspoiled subtropical beauty that was once Florida does heal and transform. It's a shame those places don't exist anymore. At least the Cape still has that mystic power. I remember the first time I drove out through the dunes, I turned to my husband and said, “It looks like the moon dreaming of itself.”
AL:
Jeez, Nicole, that line deserves a poem. I don't think I'll ever again walk a dune without recalling it.
NMK:
I know that both you and your husband are pilots. How does flying, maintaining that delicate balance between life and death, inform your writing?
AL:
Flying requires a certain healthy detachment that is a good thing to nurture. And looking down on the land provides a pilot with perspective, the visual reminder that there is always a larger picture to be seen, one we miss when we are absorbed by the closer surrounds. In writing, it is key to remember the larger scope—the humanscape and the landscape—within which the story takes place.
Paying attention, rigorous preparation, faith, trust—all things required of a pilot—are also required of the writer. And, like writing, flying is exhilarating exactly because it requires dancing on the edge.
NMK:
That's true. As writers, we all dance on the edge—of our hearts.
AL:
More poetry!
NMK:
And more love! Seems like you, and your work, inspire that reaction in people—so, many thanks for that. Can't have enough love and poetry in the world. Lots of pizza is good, too.
EADING
G
ROUP
Q
UESTIONS AND
T
OPICS FOR
D
ISCUSSION
1. Why does Jessie call her mother by her first name? What does this say about their relationship? Does your family have nicknames or use specific names in different contexts?
2. Jessie is disappointed with her first visit to Luke's, much of which she spends alone: “I sipped the coffee, bitter, and felt… What? Let down? This was so not what I expected” (p. 10). What do you think Jessie did expect out of her work with hospice? Why do you think she joined?
3. What do you think first attracts Jessie to Luke? Why do you think she has such an intense reaction when she sees his photograph?
4. Have you ever felt connected to a person simply by seeing his or her photo, as Jessie was in the novel?
5. Why does Jessie have such a strong aversion to her mother's relationship with Jan? Why, in particular, is she so opposed to her mother's transatlantic trip? How does this particular attitude reflect her own romantic insecurities? Her fears of death? Her belated grief for her father?
6. While she is on the Cape, Jessie's close friendships are with two older women—first Faye, then Nona. Why does she gravitate toward these two women? How do her relationships with each differ? How are they the same?
7. Jessie says, after Luke gets sick on their outing to Dairy Queen, “Later I would see that, from the beginning, I wanted too much.
Wanted too much in a fierce and violent way that could only lead to trouble” (p. 105). What does she mean by this?
8. The use of hair as a metaphor threads through much of the book. Faye points out that hair, out of which Jessie makes her jewelry, is actually already dead. She says, “Odd, then, that that part of us which is dead will outlast the living—the blood, body, bones” (p. 28). Later, on the first night they spend together, Jessie tells Luke a story about a woman who is saved by her own hair. Finally, a piece of Luke's hair that Jessie had clipped is used as evidence against her. What do you think hair represents in the novel? Why is it so important?