One Hundred Names for Love: A Memoir (34 page)

Or there might be a medical emergency requiring her care, which over the years Paul and I provided in spades: broken toe (I confess, mine, from an unfortunate incident with a massage table), concussion, pinched cervical nerves, asthma, diabetes, high blood pressure, arthritic knees, congestive heart failure, and more. Or an unexpected publishing crisis or proofreading deadline. Then we’d all three gaze at each other, nod our heads, and together bleat in mock seriousness: “Never a dull moment!” Emailing old friends from college, she’d once laughingly described her job as: “stay-at-home mom for two writers.”

“You know what’s weird,” Liz said in a tone of bemusement, “Some people work in
cubicles
! . . . Of course, working with your contrarian spouse Paul isn’t all that different from working with thoroughbreds”—referring to the racehorse farm where she’d labored for a few years before nursing school—“except, unfortunately,
no whips and leathers!
” Her eyebrows leapt like twin dragon boats at a starting line.

I’d never known anyone with such expressive eyebrows. They didn’t just raise or cock. Instead they vaulted, they pranced, they sharpened into hard strawberry mesas, or curved somberly into neolithic burial mounds—especially when Paul dug his heels in.

Liz and Paul could be equally stubborn and opinionated, and it always amused me to see them hunched over the table, politely arguing about all sorts of things, from the “correct” way to take his pills without choking, or the benefits of replacing his molting loafers, to the fine points of grammar. Liz’s eyebrows would hover in a tolerant position as she listened, then close ranks to be peered under as she stated her judgment: “Well, Paul, with all due respect, I think you’re wrong this time.” Liz’s husband frequently sent his sympathies to Paul, because he knew Liz was a “tenacious arguer.”

One day when I descended into Liz’s office with a look of horror and dismay, my arms piled with seemingly infinite versions of a manuscript that needed line-by-line sorting—because I’d made the behemothic mistake of working on it in different cities, on different computers, over several years—she gazed upon me with messianic mercy and declared:

“Every poet needs at least one overly linear friend.”

About Paul’s health issues she was especially vocal. Paul protested, as a point of honor, but he also appreciated her vigilant concern, sometimes in endearing circumlocutions. Once, when Liz apologized for nagging him about checking his feet for diabetic sores, he blinked hard, then responded cordially, without a hint of sarcasm:

“Always feel free to lecture me—I’m a friend to knowledge.”

CHAPTER 30

A
T THE BEGINNING OF JUNE, A FEW SUMMERS AFTER THE
stroke, we opened the pool for the season, and Paul slid into its blue eye with a shiver of delight. Flailing some and looking a little anxious, he swam a tentative breaststroke across the shallow end.

“You’re swimming! You’re swimming!” I yelled from the patio, feeling a sudden surge of excitement. He paused long enough to grin and call back an exultant “I am, aren’t I!”

Then he suddenly turned toward the deep end and pushed off from the shallow bottom, swimming in awkward but nonetheless continuous strokes for his first lap of the season. Pausing at the far end, he gasped a bit, caught his breath, then, face beaming as if he’d astonished himself, set off on the return lap with verve.

Over the past few years, he had learned how to cope a little more with the lack of coordination, vision, and balance problems he had suffered during the stroke. Depending on where a stroke hits, one’s sense of the body’s scale and edges can change dramatically, the skin feel porous instead of elastic, a leg grow heavier, a wrist dangle looser. Suddenly one can have so many toes. But his brain was reorganizing and learning to compensate. He still had irritating trouble with things that required many steps, but he’d relearned how to hold a felt pen and write reliably in longhand, wield a knife and fork, button his shirt, steer a zipper, brush his teeth, and dozens of other commonplace but sublime small acts of complexity the brain teaches itself and then secretly remembers. All the stuff we take for granted, unless they’re taken away from us by injury.

“A bowl of raspberry and rum space dust,” I teased, on a typical morning, as I presented his usual breakfast of Egg Beaters and Smart Bacon. Then I shared with him a short article from
The Guardian
online. It reported that astronomers had identified a swirl of amino acids in Sagittarius B
2
(a giant dust cloud in the Milky Way)—and that if we had a bowl of that space dust to sample, it would taste of raspberry and rum.

“What do you make of that?”

“I need something to write with!” Paul picked up the pen, which he habitually kept next to his place at the table, almost as another type of cutlery.

“You’re holding a pen,” I replied, taken aback.

“No, I need something to
write
with!”

“You have a pen in your hand,” I said slowly, with growing puzzlement.

“To write with!”

I took hold of his hand with the pen. “Here’s a pen. You have one. Do you need a different pen?”

“Nooo—the other thing,” he sighed, getting more flustered.

“The other thing . . . a tablet to write on?”

“
Yesss!
” he crooned in relief. Yet another never-ordinary conversation to start the day.

“Thank you for an absolutely lascivious breakfast,” he pronounced with conviction, while chasing a last patch of soy bacon around his plate.

Since it was noon, my lunchtime, I joined him with a bowl of Moroccan Vegetable and Chickpea Stew.

“
Lascivious
, eh? I’d be happy to share my lunch with you.”

“No way, too burly,” he declined with a grimace. “Has that . . .
that . . . double-barreled entity sent their . . . hmm . . . their . . . spondulicks?”

Words crowded my mind. Stumped, I finally asked: “What’s a
spondulicks
?”

“Money.”

“Really? Truly? Spondulicks?” In my mind’s eye, I pictured a spastic duck.

“Yes,” he said emphatically.

“Okay.”. . .
double-barreled
. . . and
sent
...
double-barreled
. . . and
sent
. . . Do you possibly mean: Has the Johnson and Wales School sent me my check?”

“Yes!” He nodded firmly.

“
Spondulicks?
”

“Spondulicks. It’s British.”

Surely he was pulling my leg. I breezed into the library to look it up in an etymological dictionary, where I found this entry:

1856, Amer.Eng. slang, “money, cash,” of unknown origin, said to be from Gk.
spondylikos
, from
spondylos
, a seashell used as currency (the Gk. word means lit. “vertebra”). Used by Mark Twain and O.Henry and adopted into British English, where it survives despite having died in Amer.Eng.

“You’re right!” I said, returning to my seat. “I think you meant to say
check
.”

“Check. Check.
Check
,” he repeated, pressing the word into his doughy memory.

In his early-morning fog, brain cells warming up, a simple word like check could slither away. But spondulicks would do, and while he repeated check in his mind, I repeated
spondulicks
in mine. The important thing was to find a shared vocabulary.

“What’s the price of an airmail stamp?” he asked Liz.

“Ninety-eight cents,” she advised. “But it’s probably easiest if you use one of the dollar stamps.”

“Thanks for invading my darkness,” Paul replied chivalrously.

“How about the screed . . . ?” He moved his hand through the air as if he were writing in invisible ink. Since he had trouble finding the word
paper
or
essay
, Liz had become well acquainted with screed, the Middle English word Paul often used for any form of writing.

“The manuscript I typed for you?”

“Yes,” he said. “What’s the total mileage?”

“A little more than . . . eight . . . hundred . . . words.” She slowed down at the numbers to give him time to manage the sum. “Just the right length. That’s what
Transfuge
asked you for.”

“Good.”

“Oh, by the way, don’t forget you have an appointment with Dr. Blemkin this afternoon.”

Wanting to know if his eye doctor accepted check or credit card, Paul queried: “What does Dr. Blemkin
traffic
in?”

Her eyebrows arched like silk worms. Then she replied: “You’ll need to take your credit card with you.”

It was a typical exchange. We didn’t interrupt Paul when he was trying to speak, which usually required his full attention. In his strain to communicate, he knew just what he meant, but was not aware he was substituting an odd word or expression. The three of us sometimes laughed about the word chimeras of the day, with Paul cackling over them as much as we did. It delighted the part of his personality that had always appreciated gaudiness, especially in language.

“What does Dr. Blemkin
traffic in?!
” Liz repeated with an amused smile later that afternoon, as she massaged Icy Hot into his crooked fingers.

Paul giggled. “Did
I
say that?”

“You did.”

“Opium?” He thought a moment. “Nepenthes?”

“
Nepenthe
?” I said. “Where did that come from?”

Laughing, he shrugged. “Floated up.” To the surface of his mind, he meant, from the lily-pad-covered word-pond beneath.

“Okay, okay, what is it?” Liz asked. Few could feign exasperation with such aplomb.

“Soporific,” Paul explained.

I could tell Liz was paging through her mental pharmacopeia under the letter N. She wouldn’t find it there, it was too esoteric an allusion from his school days, when he had had to translate books of the
Odyssey
.

“Ancient Greek,” I added. “Some Egyptian herb they took to forget their grief.” How odd, I thought.
He even remembers that the original word had an s at the end, which English translators dropped by mistake because they confused it for a plural suffix
. At some point in our decades together, he must have spoken to me about it, but I couldn’t remember where or when.

Paul laughed, shook his head, grinned proudly. “I never know what I’m going to say!”

“But you can
say
what you mean most of the time. That’s huge. I’m really proud of you.”

“I am, too,” Liz chimed in as she stretched his cramped finger until it almost straightened for a moment, and he flashed her the tortured grimace of some Inuit masks.

Wrong words still veered through his speech like errant comets. Deciphering his sentences was still taxing for me. Not as taxing as it was for him to utter, of course—it might take Paul five minutes of false starts to work a sentence free.

“The movie starts at two. No. Two. No. Two, three, four.
Four
,” he’d declare with relief at finally finding the right word. Even then he might choose a word by default because he couldn’t lasso the ideal one.

Once he was truly awake, he was fresher. But that’s when he tended to be writing in his study, or working with Liz on revisions. I spent more hours with him in the late afternoons and evenings, when he was sundowning. By mistake, he sometimes referred to that period, quaintly, as his “five o’clock shadow.” By now I knew that when he was fatigued, asking him open-ended questions (“Which movie would you like to watch?”) didn’t work well. Instead I used short phrases and offered him choices in pairs (“Would you rather watch
A Perfect Murder or A Gathering Storm
?

The thriller or the Churchill movie?” “Shrimp for dinner or Tasty Bite?”). Then, by using the words I’d already primed his mind with, he could simply model his reply on mine: “Tasty Bite. The Churchill movie.”

Some of his days seemed cut loose from past and future. Out of the blue he couldn’t remember something that happened yesterday, or he’d forget a routine (taking vitamins) that had been part of each day for months. To him it was unbelievable, rumor, not conscious, not real, yet another figment he must take on faith.

“We spoke about it last week,” I reminded him when he complained he didn’t know about the doctor’s appointment that day.

“Last week is mythic to me!” he snapped in gruff exasperation.

Whenever he poured milk into a mug, half of it still spilled over the front edge. The first hundred or so times, I tried centering his hand over the cup, showing him where to pour. But he never did improve his aim (though he did improve at mopping up). People don’t just calculate sums. While pouring milk, we gauge how far a stream of milk is from the edge of a cup, and while walking we compute how high a foot must lift to glide safely over a curb. For depth perception, the brain relies on visual clues
plus
the ability to recalibrate distances if the situation or landscape changes. Paul’s brain had lost the knack of counting, and he also had trouble judging distances. Maybe that contributed to his spilling when he poured, and how easily he tripped over steps and curbs.

But few things continued to plague Paul more than remembering
how
things were done. Over and over, he relearned how to dial the phone, open a pull-tab carton of milk, unlatch a pillbox, push the microwave’s one-minute button the correct number of times, and a hundred other feats. Check-writing proved hopeless. He’d write the wrong name, the wrong amount, the wrong date, all on the wrong lines—there seemed an infinite number of mistakes he could make with a single check. Sometimes it took an hour to get one check right. But he kept trying. If he didn’t do something regularly he forgot how. It was as if he needed to reinstall lost habits, which are really mental shortcuts. The brain would grind to a halt if it had to think every time its owner tied a shoelace or wielded a fork. So, to keep household life flowing smoothly, we established simple routines and stuck to them. Doing the same things at roughly the same time each day seemed to leave Paul more energy to devote to relearning speech and the arts of once-familiar tasks.

Most afternoons we’d convene for a midday break. “Wombat Teatime!” Liz would holler to me in my study, and I’d pack up work for the day and wander down the hallway to join them, in the style of a British afternoon tête-à-tête, my mind often trailing thought-clouds from faraway atolls. As the three of us caught up on our day’s doings, our planet seemed to grow smaller and non sequiturs flew. A typical teatime conversation: I emerged full of news of Nyepi, the Balinese national day of silence and introversion. We decided I should learn to touch-type when I retired—Liz and Paul agreed I’d never have the patience to do it now, plus they got such a kick out of watching me type like a mad, two-fingered organist. Liz vented about her husband. Paul announced he had been writing an essay about “George Foreman and cows.” Liz popped an eyebrow in surprise. I’d do my best to horrify Liz and Paul with favorite awful puns, such as: “What geometric shape most resembles a lost parrot?” Answer, of course: a Polly-gone.